Lovable to Webflow

Migrate from Lovable to Webflow

Lovable can get a working site or application surprisingly far, surprisingly quickly. Moving the marketing surface to Webflow does not mean throwing that work away. I separate the public website from the application, keep the code and services that still have a job, and rebuild the part marketing needs to own.

Start a project

A migration like this usually takes 2–4 weeks

Why people move

What changes when you move from Lovable to Webflow.

What is being compared	Lovable	Webflow
What the tool leaves you with	Lovable A React codebase, in a repository you own	Webflow A site in the Designer, and no repository to maintain Lovable genuinely wins this and it is the reason this migration is a decision rather than an escape. You own the output. The question is whether you want to keep owning it for the marketing pages specifically.
Changing a headline	Lovable A change to the application project, and another deploy of it	Webflow Editing the text and publishing the marketing site on its own
Repeating a section	Lovable Whatever the generation produced, which may be five copies	Webflow One component, and a symbol override where it differs
The services behind it	Lovable Supabase, auth and anything else wired in by the project	Webflow Untouched, and reached from the site rather than contained by it
Content model	Lovable The application's backend, and the data model built for it	Webflow Collections designed for publishing, and for the people who do it
Who maintains it	Lovable Whoever owns the application code, on the terms code is owned	Webflow Webflow for the platform, your team for the content

Once you have decided

What actually migrates.

What you have	What happens	Why
Marketing pages	Rebuild	Rebuilt as templates and components. The generated markup is worth reading for the design decisions in it and is not worth porting, because the thing being bought here is a system that marketing can operate.
Copy, posts and case studies	Move	This is real content and it moves as content, into pages and collections, rather than staying as text inside a component file.
The application and its services	Depends	If there is a signed-in product behind the marketing pages, it keeps its repository, its deploys and whatever it is wired into, Supabase included, and Webflow sits in front of it. If the project was only ever a marketing site, the repository retires at cutover and that is the cleaner outcome.
Custom React components	Depends	Worth reading before assuming. Some are a layout somebody prompted into existence and are an afternoon to rebuild. Some are a real interface with state in them, and those are an argument for keeping a route on the application rather than recreating it in a marketing site.
URLs and redirects	Reconfigure	Mapped from the routes the site currently serves, with anything the application keeps answering excluded rather than redirected.

Before you budget it

Where this migration gets complicated.

01

Repeated sections were often copied rather than made reusable

Generated code answers the prompt in front of it, so the same hero can exist five times with five sets of values. That is fine to look at and misleading to estimate from: what looks like one component to rebuild is sometimes five pages that have quietly drifted apart.
02

The intent is not always written down anywhere

The code reads fine and is as inspectable as any other code. What is missing is why: whether a component is a reusable layout, real application behavior, or scaffolding from an earlier prompt that nothing calls any more. Reading the implementation is often the only way to tell, and that is an hour nobody budgeted rather than a difficult afternoon.

How it runs

How the migration works.

01

Plan

What the repository is actually doing: which routes are marketing, which belong to the application, and what each side depends on.
02

Build

Templates are built in the Designer with the repository open beside them, because a generated component is worth reading for the design decisions in it even when none of the code comes across.
03

Migrate

Content in, assets rehosted and checked against the source, and every address that changes given a rule pointing straight at its replacement.
04

Launch

Forms at the record, every template at three widths and every old address requested, all before anything is switched. Then typically 2–4 weeks from start to live, and a week of watching what the old addresses return.

What you are buying

What is included.

Design rebuild

Rebuilt directly against the existing site.
Responsive development

Desktop, tablet and mobile, built and checked.
CMS architecture

Collections and fields mapped before build.
Content migration

Migrated and checked against the source.
Asset migration

Collected, compressed and rehosted.
Forms and integrations

Tested through to the final record.
Redirects

Changed URLs mapped directly to replacements.
Metadata and canonicals

Preserved wherever possible.
Search footprint preservation

URLs inventoried before and checked after.
Pre-launch QA

Forms, templates and old URLs verified.
Post-launch support

One week of indexing and traffic checks included.

Search visibility can move during a migration. The goal is to preserve what search engines already understand, and to catch what changed quickly after launch.

Other migrations

Coming from somewhere else?

Reach out and see if we are a good fit.

Start a project

Currently booking two to four weeks out.